News & Features
Special Workshop on Teaching by the Case Method
Harvard Education Letter Named a Finalist for Several Awards
"It's Being Done" reviewed by Washington Post's Jay Mathews
"It's Being Done" Named a Top Education Book for 2007
Ed in 08's Roy Romer Recommends Pay-for-Performance Teacher Compensation
Harvard Education Letter wins "Best Newsletter"
Finding High-Achieving Schools in Unexpected Places
HEL Web Exclusive: Educators as āApplied Developmentalistsā
Special Issue on Assessing NCLB
Interview with Author Thomas Hehir in Ed. Magazine
Interview with U.S. Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings
More from Harvard Education Publishing Group
- New Research Helps Define and Develop Quality PreK and Elementary Teaching
- An Interview with Ronald Ferguson on the Achievement Gap
- Interview with Karin Chenoweth
- Exclusive Web Feature on Educators as "Applied Developmentalists"
- In Praise of the Comprehensive High School by Laura Cooper
- Special Series on PreK-3 Education
Table of Contents for Collateral Damage
Acknowledgments Foreword by Nel Noddings
Preface
Chapter 1 A Short History of High-Stakes Testing Arguments For and Against Its Use, Its Place in Contemporary Society, and a Brief Introduction to Campbell's Law
Chapter 2 The Prevalence and Many Forms of Cheating and the Problem of Absolute and Relativistic Standards for Judging Such Occurrences
Chapter 3 Excluding Students from Education by Design and by Neglect, the Crisis of Caring in Our Schools, and the Special Case of the “Bubble Kids”
Chapter 4 States Cheat Too! How Statistical Trickery and Misrepresentation of Data Mislead the Public
Chapter 5 What Happens to Validity When Indicators Are Distorted and Corrupted, the Many Ways That High-Stakes Testing Promotes Such Distortion and Corruption, and How Those Practices Lead to Confusion About What Test Scores Mean
Chapter 6 How High-Stakes Testing Undermines Public Education and the Teaching Profession While Also Destroying Both Teacher and Student Morale
Chapter 7 We Conclude That High-Stakes Testing Provides Perfect Conditions for Campbell's Law to Operate, Ignores Standards for Professional Conduct and Appropriate Test Use, and Is Unnecessary Because Alternative Systems of Accountability Exist
Notes
About the Authors
Index
Back to the book.